Single-Day Conversion Discrepancies in Mida VS Other Analytics Tool?

Created by Donald Ng, Modified on Thu, 15 May at 1:39 AM by Donald Ng

When comparing A/B test results in Mida with metrics from Google Analytics (GA4) or other analytics tools, you may notice discrepancies—especially in single-day reports.


Here’s why that happens.


How Mida Tracks Conversions

Mida is purpose-built for A/B testing, not general analytics. It tracks conversions based on:

  • The day a user first enters a test (i.e., when they are assigned to a variant)

  • One conversion per user, regardless of how many times they convert later

So, in Mida, all conversions are tied back to the day a user first entered the test—even if they purchase days later.


Example: Why April 8 Might Look Off


Let’s say a user’s journey looks like this:

DateAction
April 7First visit → enters Variant A
April 8Returns and makes a purchase
  • In GA4: The purchase will show under April 8.

  • In Mida: That user’s conversion will be attributed to April 7, because that’s when they were first bucketed into the test.

So when you look at Mida’s April 8 data, it’s only showing:

  • Users who first entered the test on April 8

  • Their eventual conversions (even if they buy days later)


How to Compare More Accurately


To make a fair comparison:

  • Use Mida’s Event Log to view raw conversion events with timestamps.

  • Match GA4 events with Mida's first exposure date rather than the event date.

  • For day-by-day breakdowns, aggregate both tools by cohort start date if possible.


Summary

ToolCounts Conversion On
GA4The date the purchase happened
MidaThe date the user first entered the test


If you're seeing fewer conversions in Mida for a specific day, it doesn’t mean they’re missing—it’s likely those users entered the test earlier.

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article